[Discussion] Without Ino-Shika-Cho, the alliance would've lost the war

[UzumakiZoey]

everyone's a big part in every war they're involved in. But yeah the trio are very vital in the alliance!

 

[NobleRider]

yes ino shika cho good combo but without naruto chakra the ino shika cho would've died

 

[Moe22]

Okay everyone, I know Naruto was the most crucial part of the war -_- if you read the thread, I'd give you examples of how they saved Naruto's life as well.

 

[Sherlock.]

I agree.... Ino-Shika-Cho's great teamwork has helped the good side many times....

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

 

[Fodder#5]

No Ino-Shika-Cho were very pivotal to the success of the Alliance. Both sets of them. And going forward, at least Shikamaru and Choji will be important to the continuing success of Konoha

 

[SO6PSenjuUchiha]

without naruto there would be no naruto xd

 

[Moe22]

without naruto there would be no naruto xd

Wrong. It'd be called "Sasuke"

 

[Itachi75]

very true

 

[Honord Sage]

The Zetsu clones were about to end the War for Obito until Naruto stop them. That's the Facts. And thats the Bottom Line.

 

[Moe22]

The Zetsu clones were about to end the War for Obito until Naruto stop them. That's the Facts. And thats the Bottom Line.

Hahahaha I've never heard something so stupid. Kitsuchi's division clobbered all their Zetsu, as well as many other divisions such as Darui's and Kakashi's took out a large number of them. It was Shikamaru's plan to surround themselves and it stopped the Zetsu from attacking until they could find a way to weed them out. They were going to find a way eventually, but Naruto showing up just quickened the process.

 

[SO6PSenjuUchiha]

Wrong. It'd be called "Sasuke"

false it would be called itachi

 

[Moe22]

false it would be called itachi

"Chojuro: Shippuden"

 

[KellBell101]

Hey, great theory! ^^

 

[Decimation206]

I would concur but i dont think they would of lost they just would have lost a lot more men

 

[Moe22]

I would concur but i dont think they would of lost they just would have lost a lot more men

Well a loss of a significant amount of men results in a lost war.

 

[Ovan]

You are very right.