[Debate] Red VS Blue...where's your money?

Shirohebi

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
486
Reaction score
22
Well, everybody here knows the Korean peninsula is on fire but...let's see thing a little bit more carefully: on one side, let's call it the Blue side, we have South Korea, fully supported by the USA (ok, their army may look like a Korean one, their soldiers too but...C'mon! They're americans in disguise!) and the USA already sent a squad of almighty Stealth Bomber B-2 Spirit:devil: armed with nukes and another squad of the fantastic 5th gen F-22 Raptor, the greatest warplane ever. Also there are two destroyers, a radar platform and 40 k+ soldiers (really, this guys never seem to run out of war power!) I think (I THINK, not for sure) that in case of war the member of NATO will get involved too...on that side, so....damn. I think Blue is a good choice to bet, but...

In the Red side there's North Korea, lots of nukes and a crazy leader, 2 million soldiers with a death wish willing to protect their Supreme Leader, first Army in the world in terms of soldier quantity and fourth in the weaponry department. They're going to receive aid from Russia :devil: (what could I say about Russia you don't know already? They can easily erase any country/alliance of countries in a blink of an eye) and China (these ones may not be that developed but they have the nuke too...and they're about a zillion of them!) And having in mind that not China nor Russia have shown their true power in the last decades... Red is a good choice too...:eek:h:

What do you say, Red or Blue?
 

KGB Kakuzu

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
12,448
Reaction score
1,621
Purple...if it becomes Red VS Blue, we will all mix in an oddly spectacular hue of a nuclear holocaust...

But in terms of overall power. Probably Red. In a World War: Poplulation and Economy (resources) play the largest role (naturally assuming one side doesn't have COMPLETE retards for commanders)....China and Russia both have large populations, and good and a rapidly growning economy....so you could say the war (pre-nuclear holocaust) would be comprised of elite units of Chinese and Russian troops moving against the US with an onslaught of Fodder North Korean Masses (yet North Korea still has nuclear weapons, and as such cannot be ignored).

Russia has the Su-47 Berkut...while not as advanced as the Raptor, it can still play within its ballpark. China's simple numbers and growing economy is simply dangerous in and of itself.


America alone probably cannot beat both Russia and China while covering for South Korea, and the threat of the North Koreans....but of course it wouldn't just be those nations. Even then, the United Nations would probably be used as a better means of negotiation. I doubt China and Russia would go to war over Northe Korea's actions.
 

PTran5

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
883
Reaction score
155
Neither.

If there's going to be a war, I don't think any country will use nuclear weapons. Right now there is enough nuclear bombs to destroy Earth a hundred times over.
 

Shirohebi

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
486
Reaction score
22
Purple...if it becomes Red VS Blue, we will all mix in an oddly spectacular hue of a nuclear holocaust...

But in terms of overall power. Probably Red. In a World War: Poplulation and Economy (resources) play the largest role (naturally assuming one side doesn't have COMPLETE retards for commanders)....China and Russia both have large populations, and good and a rapidly growning economy....so you could say the war (pre-nuclear holocaust) would be comprised of elite units of Chinese and Russian troops moving against the US with an onslaught of Fodder North Korean Masses (yet North Korea still has nuclear weapons, and as such cannot be ignored).

Russia has the Su-47 Berkut...while not as advanced as the Raptor, it can still play within its ballpark. China's simple numbers and growing economy is simply dangerous in and of itself.


America alone probably cannot beat both Russia and China while covering for South Korea, and the threat of the North Koreans....but of course it wouldn't just be those nations. Even then, the United Nations would probably be used as a better means of negotiation. I doubt China and Russia would go to war over Northe Korea's actions.

Ehhh...I think there're only 2 SU-47 Berkut actually flying, for they're only prototypes. Russia's ace right now is the PAK-FA, some ppl say it's as good as the F-22, some say slightly better. And at least Russia will go to war if that comes to happen. They have a lot of interests there and it's also not too far from their territories. And China...I think they could join that party too at some point.
 

Shirohebi

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
486
Reaction score
22
Neither.

If there's going to be a war, I don't think any country will use nuclear weapons. Right now there is enough nuclear bombs to destroy Earth a hundred times over.

Yeah, I can say you've watched 'Home', but saddly life isn't that way. North Korea declared itself in a war status, and already has lots of nukes aiming every american naval base in the Pacific. They also have a few ones aiming to the South Korea's major cities so...get ready to rumble!
 

PTran5

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
883
Reaction score
155
Yeah, I can say you've watched 'Home', but saddly life isn't that way. North Korea declared itself in a war status, and already has lots of nukes aiming every american naval base in the Pacific. They also have a few ones aiming to the South Korea's major cities so...get ready to rumble!
Nope I never heard of 'Home' before. We can say goodbye to our planet if one does use a nuclear weapon.
 

Shirohebi

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
486
Reaction score
22
Nope I never heard of 'Home' before. We can say goodbye to our planet if one does use a nuclear weapon.
Hahaha! Nope, you don't have to be so dark about it. Our good planet Earth can resist some nukes before going down. There have been lots of nuclear test during the last century, and even a month ago in North Korea and here we are. They're just wondering 'what if..' and I think they'll do it only to see what happens.
 

cptenn94

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
2,779
Reaction score
274
if north korea does not stop its aggression, then there will be a huge gapeing hole where the korean pennisula used to be.NOrth will wipe out south, and us will wipe out north. China and russia will not back n korea. China wants our jobs and money, while russia is broke.
 

Shirohebi

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
486
Reaction score
22
if north korea does not stop its aggression, then there will be a huge gapeing hole where the korean pennisula used to be.NOrth will wipe out south, and us will wipe out north. China and russia will not back n korea. China wants our jobs and money, while russia is broke.

Ok, I guess that when you say 'us' you mean the USA...and here's the funny fact: the USA couldn't face North Korea right now! If NATO supports them it's possible, but not by themselves. Plus they have to assist South Koreans. Russia is far from being broke, that's only propaganda s***t, they have a very strong economy and China...well, you know! Both sides, Red and Blue are forces to be reckon with so...wich side do you choose?
 
Top