I like your message, but the presentation is quite arrogant. I wouldn't call people dumb over a silly manga facts, but heehh... maybe it's just your 'style'.
What I read is most people said it's in the databooks, many people use that as proof. Let them, I'd say.... Weren't you the one who asked people once to accept the story for what it is?
Is there any reason, other than feeding your ego, to point out such things? I mean, if you wanted to enlighten with a nice correction(if you're right), it would've have been awesome material for a great thread. Yet, you chose this... meh...
Have a nice day!
EDIT: I am still under the impression that you still need AMA and TSUKI(MADARA HAS TSUKIYOMI, REMEMBER?)
What I read is most people said it's in the databooks, many people use that as proof. Let them, I'd say.... Weren't you the one who asked people once to accept the story for what it is?
Is there any reason, other than feeding your ego, to point out such things? I mean, if you wanted to enlighten with a nice correction(if you're right), it would've have been awesome material for a great thread. Yet, you chose this... meh...
Have a nice day!
EDIT: I am still under the impression that you still need AMA and TSUKI(MADARA HAS TSUKIYOMI, REMEMBER?)
Last edited: