Recent content by Sennin of Logic

Insanity. That's the only way to describe this.

This was not originally the terms of her job. Her job was to provide marriage licences to people under laws that did not contradict her belief. Her choice was a job that didn't contradict her beliefs, but was changed to be something that does not fit her beliefs. You're basically saying "Oh...

I think legal action was required in that situation, but jail is too much. It's a public job to issue licences. Now, I sympathize with her though. It's only recently that gay marriage began legal nation wide. Originally, her job wouldn't have been in conflict with her beliefs. In any case...

So your opinion is your premise? That speaks loads. What you are doing, Mysterious, is an ad hominem attack and an appeal to novelty simultaneously. These are falalcies of reasoning, meaning that, since your replies have nothing but this, hold no merit, and can't be seriously considered as...

This whole reply didn't even remotely refute my points. This is a purely emotion-fueled argument. This makes you the primitive one pretending to be the superior one.

Here's an honest question then. Should men and women be allowed to waltz into the other ***'s bathroom if they so please? Oh goody! Because some officials say something, it's true. They never bend the rules, never. cough* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oACng87P9I0 *cough Ah,*insert...

No. I, for one, don't want a transgender male, to go into the restroom where all the biological males go just because she's a female that chooses to identify as a male. This is giving members of one *** access to the bathrooms of the opposite ***. Oh how could this go wrong?????? Either...

I've noticed that the opinion of many of the base members has shifted to Madara being stronger than Naruto and Sasuke (for all versions), so I'd like to reestablish Naruto and Sasuke's abilities in comparison to Madara and challenge commonly used arguments used for Madara. Bear in mind, I'm not...

run! And never come back!!!!!!

Ugh. pastors and priests should not be forced to take part in gay marriages, but to make it for magistrates in general is a terrible idea. Me neither. I'm sure it's taking an opinion and claiming it's "religious."

Context is key. Full quotes are the best. He's talking about illegal immigration not bringing over the best of Mexico. http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/29/media/donald-trump-statement-nbc-brian-williams/index.html?iid=EL...

Oh, this is going to end so well for ISIS. It'll be like a fly charging against a bunch of hippos and elephants.

Was this post WW2 during the "Baby Boomer" generation?

I think this is what's going on as well. Even if the benefits of marriage were removed, they'd push for it. Hopefully, they won't try taking the next step further, which is trying to force people like pastors to marry gay people under the guess "they're discriminating."

Way to go on misrepresenting my post so you could make it sound like a slippery slope fallacy. This is what I said. I didn't say all taboos without exception. I categorized any sexual taboo that doesn't do any actual harm without consent. In other words, if it isn't something that...