Take it easy, I wasn't referring at you. I said the majority. Now if you feel in the majority, fine, but don't blame it on me.
So what you say is to be taken as the absolute truth, yet, what I say is what...a lie? How am I being immature, again? For having a different opinion? And did I call you critical? As far as I typed in my previous post, I haven't. I didn't asked for anyone's praising because I don't need anyone's praise. It's my opinion, as simple as that. If someone happens to agree, fine, if not, fine again. But the fact that I can show a different interpretations doesn't mean I am wanting some kind of praise. Of course I thank people if someone says that they consider that what I've written they think it's bringing a point. It's called being respectful. That's what mom thaught me to do. Thank people for a compliment, an opinion, being it agreement or not, etc.
You might say "but you come and say no, you're wrong" to people that don't agree with you.
When the fact is simple, clear and people dismiss it, I, truly come and tell them they're wrong, but when it's about interpretation, I purely offer a different one. How does that make me immature?
All this arguing is a debating. As I've seen, NB doesn't care about this, about different perspectives of the story, different interpretations and stuff like that like other sides. However, what I argued with you about wasn't about Sakura, was about you, 'attacking' my interpretation of her acts. What is that makes other interpretations better than mine? What gives others the right to be more right than I am? If they have the right to express their oppinion that it's X, so I have mine to say it's Y. What makes their opinion above my opinion? The fact that it's the Base's majority? Oh, sorry then, but I don't bow, if that's what people want. As they have the right to say a thing, I have the right to say another. Fairly simple, I think.
See, that's your interpretation that she is weak-willed. As far as I remember, Kishi potrayed her as an strong-willed individual, as proofs stand throughout the manga. Sure, people call her weak mainly because Sasuke. But let's not forget something. Naruto is on the same boat. However, there's a difference between Naruto and Sakura expressing feelings. While Naruto had pshichologically build walls in order to not show his weakness, Sakura lets it all out and fights with it as best as she can. See, you're calling her a realistic character, yet, you dismiss the realism in her character. But sure, let's just judge only Sakura because of Sasuke, let's let Naruto out of it. While to most people looks like Naruto has no emotional weakness, he has, but the difference with him is that he hides it very, very good. And we've seen this every since part 1. He never let his actual feelings run free. But anyway, the topic here is not Naruto.
I think we're discussing here a depiction based on an actual real, person. Hence Kishi saying she is one of the most human characters in his manga.
To you it's absurd, to me, it's normal. Different views. I know Kishi does mistakes, you seem to have missed my posts where, I, personally, critiqued his writing and everyone calling me a names just because I didn't say "WOW, this is so cool" while they were screaming it's cool.
Those instances were many, however, you seem to have missed them. Not your fault, though, it's not like we meet on every thread.
Yes, it was forced by Naruto's rejection but that doesn't mean it was superficial. It was because she felt on her own skin what Naruto felt. Take out Sasuke from the equation, put any other person instead of Sasuke that calls her annoying, the same way she called Naruto annoying and I guarantee you that you'll get the same result.
Well, it seemed that for her it needed to, at that time. It's similar with Yahiko's resolution. In order to understand each other, we must feel the same pain.
Same happened here. In order for Sakura to understand how Naruto felt when she acted that way, she had to feel the same pain as him.
Quite simple.
It's called learning from your own mistakes.