AllHailLordZeustsu
Member
One thing People should not overlook is how the female characters particularly Sakura and Sarada blow up the proportion between the two series. (Naruto and Boruto)
Sakura:
Following from its predecessor, Sakura was absolutely mistreated from piss poor development to being shafted. Sakura is a poor representation as a female cast. Sakura has nothing of her own as a character without any kind of goal she aspire to be and brought nothing to the table. In this case she is nothing more but a love interest to Sasuke.
Sarada:
On the other hand, Kishi realized his mistake so he took notes and made Sarada as a refined version of Sakura with better improved personality and given her proper objective thus expanding her future potential role in the story. With that in mind, Kishi glued the idea about Sarada better portrayal as a female cast by becoming a Front battle rather than backup supporter to the point that she was given ALOT of free handout powerup without any indication of buildup and training which so far leaves a huge stain on Sasuke and other uchiha prodigies. This could fluctuate her character progression if she continues to go on a Mary Sue route.
Difference:
Sarada becoming a Mary Sue could be a huge detrimental to the series because atleast with Sakura she is too useless to the plot thus its only limited to her character.
Whereas with Sarada, she can not only potentially devolve her character development but also ruin the entire series for the very same reason why Kakashi with the MS Spam and PS Asspull ruined the foundation from both aspect of Character and Story.
Another example is Obito where a Villain can either make or break the series. In this case, Obito completely shated everything from all the inconsistencies writing, plotholes, ruining the epicness of Tobi with absolutely shit motivation, overloaded with flashback and ruined 2/3 of the entire series with that worst arc.
Sakura:
Following from its predecessor, Sakura was absolutely mistreated from piss poor development to being shafted. Sakura is a poor representation as a female cast. Sakura has nothing of her own as a character without any kind of goal she aspire to be and brought nothing to the table. In this case she is nothing more but a love interest to Sasuke.
Sarada:
On the other hand, Kishi realized his mistake so he took notes and made Sarada as a refined version of Sakura with better improved personality and given her proper objective thus expanding her future potential role in the story. With that in mind, Kishi glued the idea about Sarada better portrayal as a female cast by becoming a Front battle rather than backup supporter to the point that she was given ALOT of free handout powerup without any indication of buildup and training which so far leaves a huge stain on Sasuke and other uchiha prodigies. This could fluctuate her character progression if she continues to go on a Mary Sue route.
Difference:
Sarada becoming a Mary Sue could be a huge detrimental to the series because atleast with Sakura she is too useless to the plot thus its only limited to her character.
Whereas with Sarada, she can not only potentially devolve her character development but also ruin the entire series for the very same reason why Kakashi with the MS Spam and PS Asspull ruined the foundation from both aspect of Character and Story.
Another example is Obito where a Villain can either make or break the series. In this case, Obito completely shated everything from all the inconsistencies writing, plotholes, ruining the epicness of Tobi with absolutely shit motivation, overloaded with flashback and ruined 2/3 of the entire series with that worst arc.