Why do you insist on mischaracterizing my position? Never had I ever expressed on this website or in my life, the belief that "Muslims simply just want to kill us" or anything akin to that. You're making me out to be some hardcore, Muslim-hating-nutjob who's being impulsive and reactionary to a terrorist attack. I am not with the hate bandwagon of banning or targeting Muslims, and I'm not of the belief of purging all the refugees out Europe. I want hold the ideology of Islam accountable, I want society at large to acknowledge the problem with multiculturalism, in doing so, giving rise to the platform of Muslim reformist to pave the way for Islam in the west, and recognize that current Islamic culture is not compatible with western culture. But according to you, I want you to shut up and join my "lynch mob".
I'm on the side that wants to solve the issues that are caused by Islam, and you're on a side and that is the side that wants to create excuses for Islam, even though you try to appear neutral on the issue with no opinion. You're on the side that, when over 100,000 British Muslims believe that slaughter teenagers at an Ariana Grande concert is justified, says that is attributable to the War in the middle east. You're on the side that, when a majority of Muslims in the UK admit they wouldn't report to fellow Muslims who become radicalized and join ISIS, say in response, #NotAllMuslims. I'm waiting to hear what excuse you give to the civil unrest between civilians and refugees, or the economic collapse of European countries, or the rampant growth of refugee rape gangs across Europe; BUT WAIT
You must be registered for see images
Going beyond the issue of terrorism in Europe, yes, I've acknowledge the fact that the U.S. armed "rebel" groups in Syria that defected to ISIS and other terrorist organizations, and I've acknowledged that "counter-terrorism" was used as a means to wage proxy wars across the middle east, both on this forum; ask your friend Lightbringer about our discussion on how Obama helped fund ISIS. U.S. foreign policy is horrible and should be held accountable for having a hand in global terrorism, but we can't act like the U.S. is the core drive behind global jihad and Muslim violence. You act like the U.S. put ISIS and such other groups on the map when the vast majority of funding for Islamist terrorist groups comes from countries like Saudi Arabia. There are far more acts of barbarism committed in the name of Islam that, in context, have no connection to our meddling or exploitation of the middle east, and outside of terrorist groups, you have a culture of people who support and share the same beliefs as terrorist. I am of the belief that you cannot bring about peace and reform to the Islamic world by ousting it's secular governments and destabilizing in the middle east, and at the same time, you cannot bring about peace and reform without condemning Sharia law and criticizing Islamic culture, but that's not my problem with your points.
My problem is they're irrelevant to solving the issue of radicals infiltrating 1st world European countries and the culture war between the natives and the refugees. How can you blame the U.S. for the destabilization of Europe when it was the E.U. that permitted millions of unfiltered, unvetted refugees inside their boarders? Islamic terrorism was primarily an issue of the middle east, how did it become an issue of Manchester, London, or Paris? Now that it's in Europe it becomes an entirely different issue, and though they share a similar root problem, the solution to the issue of Islamic terrorism in Europe will not be the same solution that's employed to deal with Islamic terrorism in the middle east. Your "but what about the war?" point is a non-sequitur that only subverts dialogue and adds nothing to the conversation.
You cannot claim you want a solution and not offer any solutions. You "wanting" things to change isn't going to change anything, fence sitters with no opinions are no better than the people who make PrayForManchester hashtags.
