#Filler

Michael

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
10,478
Kin
104💸
Kumi
21💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
How can people hate on the anime when it covers majority of unexplained manga plots? Kishi and studio perriot often worked closely to rely the manga/anime and movies.

The Kaguya backstory was much needed and follow all "canon" material yet people complain?

Hagoromo in the manga talked about gamamaru and now the anime elaborates where kishi didn't it's all filler? Kishi himself basically set the guidelines/plot for these episodes and now its all coming to fruition.

People can say what they will about the anime but I consider this Kaguya arc canon just like itachi and kakashi gaiden. These "fillers" give us unexplained history of characters we love based strictly off the manga.

Also majority of Naruto fans are anime only watchers, 75% of Naruto fans don't even know the term "filler".
You must be registered for see images
 

Wabbit

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
11,335
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
How can people not hate on the anime when they trash the original source material with their trashy fanfics?
Only scums are considering the filler as canon. Is filler good? Okay it is good but that does not make it canon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NineSNS

Dantee

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
45,244
Kin
0💸
Kumi
343💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I haven't watched the anime in years. I also don't think its the content people are complaining about. It's when people use filler feats in debates
 

Michael

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
10,478
Kin
104💸
Kumi
21💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
How can people not hate on the anime when they trash the original source material with their trashy fanfics?
Only scums are considering the filler as canon. Is filler good? Okay it is good but that does not make it canon.
I'm specifically talking about character history/backstory which kishi hints in the manga but never fully explain. Like itachi's latest arc. :sigar:
 

Michael

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
10,478
Kin
104💸
Kumi
21💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I haven't watched the anime in years. I also don't think its the content people are complaining about. It's when people use filler feats in debates
Unless somebody come out saying mecha Naruto wrecks or byakugan can make people explode, I don't see the problem if its logical.
You must be registered for see images
 

Wabbit

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
11,335
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I'm specifically talking about character history/backstory which kishi hints in the manga but never fully explain. Like itachi's latest arc. :sigar:
That can satisfy some thirsty fans. But trusting filler is a mistake. I am pretty sure they will break your heart soon, they are very much capable of coming up with something retarded.
 

Magnolius

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
2,969
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
How can people hate on the anime when it covers majority of unexplained manga plots? Kishi and studio perriot often worked closely to rely the manga/anime and movies.

The Kaguya backstory was much needed and follow all "canon" material yet people complain?

Hagoromo in the manga talked about gamamaru and now the anime elaborates where kishi didn't it's all filler? Kishi himself basically set the guidelines/plot for these episodes and now its all coming to fruition.

People can say what they will about the anime but I consider this Kaguya arc canon just like itachi and kakashi gaiden. These "fillers" give us unexplained history of characters we love based strictly off the manga.

Also majority of Naruto fans are anime only watchers, 75% of Naruto fans don't even know the term "filler".
You must be registered for see images
THANK YOU! People only think of Anime as filler because it came after the Manga and is an adaptation of the Manga. What a stupid excuse to deny solid facts provided by the creators of the series.
 
Last edited:

Ansatsuken

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
27,345
Kin
4,798💸
Kumi
649💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Let me rephrase myself. Naruto definitely has more filler content but outright non canon material like dragonball GT? DBZ definitely has more non canon material.
You must be registered for see images
I'm not seeing many non-canon materials from DBZ anime. It less than Naruto sure. And shorter too. But Naruto sure have more non-canon materials than Naruto. You cant fool me Michael. You can fool other people but not me.

I dont care about GT at all why you bring it here??????
 

Michael

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
10,478
Kin
104💸
Kumi
21💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I'm not seeing many non-canon materials from DBZ anime. It less than Naruto sure. And shorter too. But Naruto sure have more non-canon materials than Naruto. You cant fool me Michael. You can fool other people but not me.

I dont care about GT at all why you bring it here??????
Wether you care or not, GT is an entire series of non canon material.
You must be registered for see images
 

Magnolius

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
2,969
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
But trusting filler is a mistake.
This man is speaking the truth. I made a theory based on the recent fillers, and when the latest episode proved that my theory was wrong NB members decided what Avatar and Signature I would use as punishment.
 

Yata Mirror

Active member
Regular
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
902
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Well Filler as a term is much correct..
For me there's noting wrong with Filler so long as it doesn't contradict the manga..
If it doesn't contradict the manga then it's cannon..
If it does, that's fanfic by SP
 
Top