Yeah, so? He's free to want whatever he wants to want unless he actually does something against the law, and the others are free to reject his proposals if they don't like them. But banning a person for his beliefs and words alone is exactly what I said it is - the very flawed thing Trump himself suggested.
that's definitely a step in the wrong direction, that's why washington and most republicans criticized trump, this guy is only helping isis recruit more people.Do you even realize how many innocent muslims that live in the us suffer because of people like him?!
Yeah, that's an interesting point of view, but no. By expressing his opinion, by no means he's murdering, burying and destroying anything. And he's not a president, we're talking about very precise things here, no need to be so tangent if you don't have the arguments to prove your point.
Your right, Donald is entitled to his bigoted logic and opinions.
I 100% agree with this.
Yeah, I know. But this has nothing to do with the initial post of mine that you've quoted :| What are you trying to say to me? That he's a flawed person and his suggestions are very doubtful to say the least? I know that shit, bruh. And I never tried to deny it.
so you think cyber-bullying is totally justifiable? people only share their opinions? this is not freedom. It's not like the government is going to ban him on it's own people from the uk are signing this petition.
Why does it sound like you pulling a Trump "Political Correct" BS? :/
Banning him only makes his point valid . I suggest debate the ideology i am not sure he will be surviving once the GOP is declared ! If he is Republican GOP it will only make the way for Hillary or Bernie to be President .
Of course he shouldn't, but this still has nothing to do with my posts. And how exactly condemning those who are trying to do the same thing what Trump suggests is supporting Trump's ideas?
Since you've edited your post, adding this, I'll edit mine. Well, at least you've admitted that they are equal to him. It's good that you understand it. But there is a difference, actually - it is that he didn't actually ban anyone. He didn't even try it, he just suggested it, while Brits are actually doing it. :sdo:
he is an idiot, nothing will change his mind. if the petition reaches 100k it means people in the uk don't welcome him here so it only makes sense to ban him. Can you please tell me how it makes his point valid?
You keep saying his opinion and beliefs. No, he actually wants to do this. :| It's a lot to do what your post.
Dude, do you even understand that there is a difference between wanting to do something and actually doing it? :| I may want to kill someone, I can even shout it out loud - for instance, when I'm angry, but unless I actually do it or at least try it, I haven't done anything illegal.
Of course it does it only states his point valid . A bunch of online petition is laughable you are just overreacting an for the record there are thousands like him having this phobia will you ban everyone . It is not correct i am saying invite him to the debate and make him trap with the flawed ideology of his .
