Re: Naruto The Last Plot Summary (Possible Spoiler, Possible True OrFake)
About "retcon", don't forget that Kishimoto did tons of retcons in the manga too! For example:
1.Black Zetsu, despite it was shown that Madara created him, "reveals" to be the creation of Kaguya, just "pretended" to be Madara's creation.
2.Black Zetsu "rewritte" the Uchiha Tables, despite not having neither Rinnegan nor even Sharingan. Also, does Kishimoto wants be to believe that the Uchihas wouldn't notice that the text on the tables suddenly changed?
3.Despite there were no evidences or foreshadowings, Obito was behind the Fox's attack! Further, there were no foreshadowing that Kurama had a Jinchuuriki at that time or even before Naruto!
And so on. However, it would give answer why did were the Konoha elders sure that an Uchiha was behind the attack while the only persons who saw the criminal has been killed before they could tell it to anyone or why did the "we must strengthening the bond between the clan and the village" Fugaku suddenly changed his view of point.
So I don't think it's bigger retcon than the entire Black Zetsu / Kaguya / Shinju thing were, but that's my viewpoint about "retcon".
Anyway, I say let's wait for further spoilers.
This sounds really, really fake. This part especially. I also can't imagine Kishimoto adding on to a delicate plot point like the Uchiha/village conflict when he already closed it off in the manga series. It's also completely random and has nothing to do with romance/Toneri's clan/the current characters. This would also be considered a complete retcon, considering that we were already given reasons for why all of that happened.
The concept of a Nara clan member becoming a nukenin just because he felt like it and hating the Uchiha whilst wanting them all dead just because he didn't like their personalities is like a bad fanfic. Lol
People have been saying that the spoiler is real, but don't provide a source. Others say that it's fake and don't provide a source. However, the latter is more likely since those people have a right to say that...nothing is 100% legit until a source is given.
About "retcon", don't forget that Kishimoto did tons of retcons in the manga too! For example:
1.Black Zetsu, despite it was shown that Madara created him, "reveals" to be the creation of Kaguya, just "pretended" to be Madara's creation.
2.Black Zetsu "rewritte" the Uchiha Tables, despite not having neither Rinnegan nor even Sharingan. Also, does Kishimoto wants be to believe that the Uchihas wouldn't notice that the text on the tables suddenly changed?
3.Despite there were no evidences or foreshadowings, Obito was behind the Fox's attack! Further, there were no foreshadowing that Kurama had a Jinchuuriki at that time or even before Naruto!
And so on. However, it would give answer why did were the Konoha elders sure that an Uchiha was behind the attack while the only persons who saw the criminal has been killed before they could tell it to anyone or why did the "we must strengthening the bond between the clan and the village" Fugaku suddenly changed his view of point.
So I don't think it's bigger retcon than the entire Black Zetsu / Kaguya / Shinju thing were, but that's my viewpoint about "retcon".
Anyway, I say let's wait for further spoilers.