Origin of Species paper coming up

[minato93]

Can anybody give me a good scholarly journal or paper that defends creationism or gives major flaws of evolution--from an origin of human standpoint or any standpoint (like the big bang).

I will not debate evolution or creationism on this forum.

I hope y'all can give me some good sources.

Creationism sources are the hardest thing to find; I mean good one's from educated people.

 

[Silent Phantom]

Ken Ham lol.

 

[4bdN]

darwin stated himself that if there were mathematcle order in the universe that his THEORY (not proof) of chaos would be disprovin

 

[Hipster Madara]

You can find plenty wrong with Darwin, but it sure would be hard to find something wrong with the current theory. Perhaps you could find ambiguity but I would say it doesn't look good for creationists at all.

 

[minato93]

Ken Ham lol.

He's good,
Does Ken Ham have a scholarly paper? I can't use just his website. Teacher's rule.

darwin stated himself that if there were mathematcle order in the universe that his THEORY (not proof) of chaos would be disprovin

Where can I find this quote?

You can find plenty wrong with Darwin, but it sure would be hard to find something wrong with the current theory. Perhaps you could find ambiguity but I would say it doesn't look good for creationists at all.

I know, it's an up hill battle trying to find good sources; right now, I'm trying to find weakness in dating techniques and others. Trying to find the flaws of the big bang theory, I'm trying to understand this law of thermodynamics that can disprove it--but thermodynamics is complicated.

 

[Mille Ignis]

Ken Ham vs. Bill Nye is a great debate to watch. If you're looking for scholarly journals just use google scholar.

Also if you're looking for debating techniques, ArguingFromIgnorance is a good youtube channel to watch.

 

[minato93]

Ken Ham vs. Bill Nye is a great debate to watch. If you're looking for scholarly journals just use google scholar.

Also if you're looking for debating techniques, ArguingFromIgnorance is a good youtube channel to watch.

Can't find scholarly journals defending creationism; that's the problem, tried google scholar already.
@Bold: Dating techniques--like radioactive dating.

 

[Hipster Madara]

Ken Ham vs. Bill Nye is a great debate to watch. If you're looking for scholarly journals just use google scholar.

Also if you're looking for debating techniques, ArguingFromIgnorance is a good youtube channel to watch.

How's it great when the debate was so one sided?

 

[kageking]

Hard to find arguments in support of creationism on a rational level. I'd check wikipedia but look through the sources at the bottom for not just what is written on wikipedia.

 

[WolfHaley]

How's it great when the debate was so one sided?

Most tend to be on the topic.

 

[Sasuke2]

There's no evidence for creationism other than faith.

 

[minato93]

Hard to find arguments in support of creationism on a rational level. I'd check wikipedia but look through the sources at the bottom for not just what is written on wikipedia.

Just checked, I think I may have a lead. Thanks!

There's no evidence for creationism other than faith.

You're right. But I'm doing a debate paper--in a debate, if you can't give a rational argument proving your point, you go on the offensive and destroy the other side.

 

[SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO]

Stephen Meyer:
INTELLIGENT DESIGN: THE ORIGIN OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION AND THE HIGHER TAXONOMIC CATEGORIES

You must be registered for see links

 

[Mille Ignis]

Can't find scholarly journals defending creationism; that's the problem, tried google scholar already.
@Bold: Dating techniques--like radioactive dating.

You will never find a scholarly paper on creationism because there is no evidence for it. The best place to find information on creationism is Ken Ham's site

You must be registered for see links

. For radioactive dating techniques, Wikipedia has a good list. You can also look at the sources that Wikipedia uses to find a more credible site for you paper. However any .edu or .gov site is credible; .org sites can be, but I don't always trust them.

 

[minato93]

Stephen Meyer:
INTELLIGENT DESIGN: THE ORIGIN OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION AND THE HIGHER TAXONOMIC CATEGORIES

You must be registered for see links

Thanks!

You will never find a scholarly paper on creationism because there is no evidence for it. The best place to find information on creationism is Ken Ham's site

You must be registered for see links

. For radioactive dating techniques, Wikipedia has a good list. You can also look at the sources that Wikipedia uses to find a more credible site for you paper. However any .edu or .gov site is credible; .org sites can be, but I don't always trust them.

You're greatly appreciated.

 

[SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO]

Thanks!


You're greatly appreciated.

You're welcome, for a Philosophical argument for Creationism/Intelligent Design, here is an article by Alvin Plantinga concerning the errors of materialistic reductionism in Evolution:

You must be registered for see links

 

[minato93]

You're welcome, for a Philosophical argument for Creationism/Intelligent Design, here is an article by Alvin Plantinga concerning the errors of materialistic reductionism in Evolution:

You must be registered for see links

I downloaded it, I'm gonna start reading it tomorrow. What exactly is materialistic reductionism in evolution?

 

[SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO]

I downloaded it, I'm gonna start reading it tomorrow. What exactly is materialistic reductionism in evolution?

It has to do with the philosophical view of materialism, basically it says that empiricism and material causality encompasses the totality of objective phenomena, and that evolutionary mechanisms are completely accounted for through natural selection, the "Universal Acid" as Daniel Dennett calls it.

 

[minato93]

It has to do with the philosophical view of materialism, basically it says that empiricism and material causality encompasses the totality of objective phenomena, and that evolutionary mechanisms are completely accounted for through natural selection, the "Universal Acid" as Daniel Dennett calls it.

Gotcha. .......

 

[SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO]

Gotcha. .......

Yes, and also, strong reductionism argues that we do not have Qualia aka qualitative experience, we are merely "strong A.I" according to them, read Mervin Minsky and Daniel Dennett regarding the material reductionist's view of consciousness.