Wikia

[Orochimaruofthesound]

I dont understand why people argue its not a viable source when we all use it.
I get that "ANYONE" can write and edit but i have never came across inaccurate information on there

Every one on here uses wikis so Wikia is just as viable as an out of date databook

 

[Obito3631]

You're right It is the most reliable source beside the manga and databook

 

[Ldude]

You have never come across inaccurate information.... as far as you know. Can you corrobate eveything you read there?

 

[Cruciatus]

Yeah the Wikia is actually pretty damn accurate.

 

[Edo Odin]

I dont understand why people argue its not a viable source when we all use it.
I get that "ANYONE" can write and edit but i have never came across inaccurate information on there

Every one on here uses wikis so Wikia is just as viable as an out of date databook

@bold: This honestly answers your question. Of course, it's accurate most of the time, but the fact that anyone can go and edit it as he wishes results in most members not accepting it as a reliable source.

 

[Orochimaruofthesound]

You have never come across inaccurate information.... as far as you know. Can you corrobate eveything you read there?

you cant even argue with me on this so dont try

 

[NeverEnding]

Sometimes there is errors!!! But most people use that as an excuse too prove themselves right!!!

 

[Orochimaruofthesound]

Sometimes there is errors!!! But most people use that as an excuse too prove themselves right!!!

The people who Argue that its not are always the one losing the debates

 

[NeverEnding]

The people who Argue that its not are always the one losing the debates

I specifically said MOST people!!!

 

[smokesup]

"Don't believe everything you read on the internet"
- Abraham Lincoln

 

[Orochimaruofthesound]

Fact is Everyone on here uses it yet people argue its not accurate its more accurate then most other Sites you get information from

 

[saaaaaadpanda]

Wikis are not reliable because they are open source and they aren't necessarily validated by authorities. Also, there are always problems with secondary sources information.

 

[Ventalus]

If I remember right then it's still admins there that looks at the posts looking if the posts are actually any true. It's not like I can just go make a information about a country or anything and say it's stupid or anything like that before an Admin ban/deletes the thread.

 

[Orochimaruofthesound]

Wikis are not reliable because they are open source and they aren't necessarily validated by authorities. Also, there are always problems with secondary sources information.

Wikia are also moderated from time to time. the problems are from people who cant stand losing the arguments

Naruto Wikia is the most accurate naruto sourse after the manga because the databook is a couple years out of date

 

[tenten fan]

you have to cite your sorces and give a link so to use it get the links the ppl have to put there and then every body will have to believe you

 

[yep]

it states that Oro can use Mokuton while there's no proof yet (must have been written by a fanboy) but I always preferred mangafacts

 

[Orochimaruofthesound]

it states that Oro can use Mokuton while there's no proof yet (must have been written by a fanboy) but I always preferred mangafacts

The proof is that he has zetus body which is a clone of hashiramas use your common sense

 

[Horus]

Most of it Is accurate.
But There are some Mistakes Put there, and some stuff that was not supposed to be there, but put there by fanboys/girls.

 

[yep]

The proof is that he has zetus body which is a clone of hashiramas use your common sense

no proof at all most likely he can but it's not 100% (and this comes from an Oro fan)

 

[Orochimaruofthesound]

Most of it Is accurate.
But There are some Mistakes Put there, and some stuff that was not supposed to be there, but put there by fanboys/girls.

The stuff that has yet to be shown in the manga also cant be proved wrong either (I.e orochimaru knowing wood style)