Got time for one reply before ballin
Gonna need some proof, cause I'm not seeing any.
Google or youtube history of both weapons use.
You wouldnt compare a tanto to a sabre, as to comparing any weapon itself, providing "same damage" output.
You must be registered for see links
.
You must be registered for see links
.
No they are completely different Susanoo versions.
How about you read the manga?
You must be registered for see images
Lol when did I ever mention Yasaka Magatama? Madara's V3 Susanoo, which sliced apart Gaara's sand defense on top of Onoki's rock golem with a single slash. That's what I'm talking about. I'm not "mix matching feats". I'm showing you evidence but you can't even show me a single durability feat from Manda 2 that proves it can tank V4 Susanoo's attacks. Manda 2's best durability feat is tanking the rock spikes on Turtle Island's back. Literally nothing you've said gives me any reason to believe it will tank Susanoo.
@Bold then read the manga, as it was not slashes from its sword but throwing Magatamas[
You must be registered for see links
]
How about you read my arguments properly. When did I say Manda 2 can tank his attack? My argument is base on the output a restricted Susanoo could do isn't going to suffice when taking down Manda 2.
Oh man. A tail whip from Manda obliterates V4 Susanoo....no. A V3 tanked a tail whip from Naruto's avatar which has the physical strength to
You must be registered for see links
with its tail. If your assertion would even begin to make sense, you'd have to prove:
-that Manda 2's tail whip is fast enough to even hit Madara
-that Manda 2's tail whip has superior strength to Kurama Avatar
-that Manda 2's tail whip has enough force behind it to destroy Susanoo
Cause I'm seeing zero reasons to believe what you're saying, other than "Manda 2 is big, so it's strong enough to bust Susanoo." Size=/=strength. You'll need to start showing some feats soon or else there won't be anything for me to counter.
Nice to know you dont even know Madara's susanoo version to make an argument. Until you understand the version of Susanoo is available with OP then this can go somewhere,
So because snakes can sense heat, and smell through their tongues, Manda can battle completely fine without using eyesight? If that's the case, Madara cuts it to pieces with Susanoo.
@Bold Lol nice excuse like it suppose to low the summons down. Not by manga canon they aren't, as Itachi commented[
You must be registered for see links
]. Itachi stated they their movements easily tracks them.
Lol.
You must be registered for see links
No, you're completely uninformed if you think Manda will just tank a stabbing attack through the mouth from
You must be registered for see links
Susanoo.
Obviously snakes can naturally shed their skin. And Obviously I meant it a ninjutsu technique, that could be use more then once, like oral rebirth.
So? What's your point? Some fodders were cut in half, the ones further away were sent flying by the shockwave. You haven't disproven anything, all I see is you just denying that it would work without actually giving me reasons why it wouldn't. You even acknowledged that Madara's slash is what sent them flying.
Lol I dont acknowledge someone one who can't read the manga properly. Leveling the ground doesnt = being able to repel sound thats just plain stupid. Some fodders getting cut (NOT cut in half, if you actually read the damn bottom right panel) could have done much much more then what you are claiming the power behind these attack.
Read the manga properly.
Shockwaves would blow away the soundwaves because they are stronger than the soundwaves, evidenced by how a V2 Susanoo slash sent people flying and Perfect Susanoo slash was literally slicing mountains in half. V4 Susanoo's slash would be somewhere in between that which is still >>>>>>> soundwaves from the flute genjutsu, which was blown back by Part 1 Temari's fuuton.
Until you understand that all those feats of Susanoo using shockwaves are PS then we can talk. Ill educate you on how shockwaves function later, when encountering sound.
This is getting old real quick. You call my arguments desperate reach but you don't even have an argument. Lol. It's basically: "Manda 2 tanks Susanoo attacks, prove me wrong" but you don't provide any reason for why Manda would tank them. "Flute genjutsu one shots, prove me wrong", and when I do prove you wrong you continue to spout nonsense, like wind works differently than shockwaves.
Indeed this is getting old:
-Can't read manga properly to prove a point
-Can't read my arguments properly and misrepresenting them.
-Dont understand how shockwaves and air currents work, nor understand that if blown away, manga stated that all it does is delay the process not beat it. And since you can't understand, therefore it sounds nonsense to you.
It takes more chakra and effort on Kabuto's part to keep 25 targets under a genjutsu than it would for only 1 target. That's a no limits fallacy to assume that genjutsu would keep many targets under a genjutsu, and have that genjutsu be just as strong as it would be if used on one target when its chakra is distributed among 25 targets to keep them all under genjutsu, so logically the genjutsu would be weaker. It obviously would take more effort on Kabuto's part to keep 25 opponents under a genjutsu than it does to keep 1 opponent under a genjutsu.
I know you're going to bring up the Mizukage's clam genjutsu, but think of how weak that genjutsu really was shown to be. All it did was create a mirage and hide the clam's actual location. It didn't paralyze opponents like mugen onsa does, and it didn't put anyone in a genjutsu world. Besides, there's nothing to compare it to so it's rightful to assume that genjutsu would be a lot stronger if used on fewer opponents.
Nice to know you can't follow manga so you go by your bias, asspull to articulate an argument. Genjutsu effect =/= Ninjutsu. The opponent gets equal amount of effectiveness in genjutsu and breaking out solely depends on the user, chakra control, etc. Sound is a wide field Genjutsu for a reason as it can effect a whole field of opponents. Facts. No amount of bias asspull arguments can you make do actually be some "legit" counter.
I assume you're referring to how Tayuya stated that it halts the opponent's move? Fact is, the moves that genjutsu has halted are shadow posession and a ribcage Susanoo because they were connected to the user's chakra and required chakra to be molded in order to continue using that jutsu. If Madara stops molding chakra, guess what, that doesn't affect clones that are out on the battlefield. Another no limits fallacy if you think that genjutsu will actually cancel any jutsu the user is using, like Rinnegan Sasuke's PS. So there's nothing stopping Madara here from straight up breaking the jutsu with kai release, or escaping it the exact same way Sasuke and Itachi did, using a clone.
@Bold, being able to halt the things in manga doesn't limit the effect of the statement made. Plus the fact it canon fact that if anything happens to the orignal user, Like Neji and Kaguya tried to do, the clones can no longer be supported. And by feats we seen this happen, as Naruto got poisoned and clones couldn't respond[
You must be registered for see links
]. Or When Sai was put to sleep by Sakura, his clone could no longer be supported.
Except summons don't keep Madara at bay, he shits on them with zero effort. Except Kabuto didn't dodge that arrow while preparing a flute genjutsu which takes a lot of prep time compared to Madara's shunshin speed.
Nice wank this isn't an argument. Even if Madara can whoop summons that doesn't prove that he can simultaneously whoop a field of snakes and blitz Kabuto from forming a seal.
A scenario of Kabuto not dodging arrow while preparing genjutsu doesn't disprove that he could.
Fact 1: Kabuto canonically can react to those movements
Fact 2: DNA response on their own, like Sakon's KKG does.
Therefore when Kabuto is reacting to those movement the DNA only needs to worry of finishing the jutsu. Kabuto does all the walking and Tayuya does all the talking.
The irony in this statement, lol. This is what I meant by you never give up even when proven wrong.
Yea clearly irony. So confident that you know what you talking about. And by the end of this debate you will still be sprouting bs about me, despite looking poor.