He had better Chakra control, though I think Naruto would win because of his chakra levelI consider Konohamaru > Tsunade arc Naruto, since konohamaru actually took out one of peins bodies.
Anyways Tsunade still wins.
I agreeTsunade obviously wins. Konohamaru is fodder.
Does that really matter? But sure why not.adult Konohamaru?
I agreeTsunade shits on that fodder.
Whet? Tsunade had to be restricted so she wouldn't kill the strongest peon, kishi said so himself, she excuse was that she hits to hardClone Feint into surprise attack rasengan to the head. GG
Konohamaru clone Feinted a Pain path. Pain > Tsunade.
Someone said that he beats Byakugou tsunadeDon't know why this thread was made when you know Tsunade shits...
No he doesn't. Naruto is Fodder without Sage mode and Kurama power, and that's basically Konohamaru.Adult Konohamaru rapes her tough. He's a jonnin by then, and Tsunade is just using one finger.
Naruto without SM and Kurama beats Sakura and Tsunade tho.....No he doesn't. Naruto is Fodder without Sage mode and Kurama power, and that's basically Konohamaru.
Tsunade low diffs adult konohamaru at best.
NOt even in fanfiction.Naruto without SM and Kurama beats Sakura and Tsunade tho.....
....Naruto rasenshurikens both of those useless *****es.NOt even in fanfiction.
Base incomplete non-throwable FRS couldnt kill Kakuzu. Byakugo regenerates.....Naruto rasenshurikens both of those useless *****es.
Not without coughing up blood in the process, giving her opponent the opportunity needed to cut her head off.Base incomplete non-throwable FRS couldnt kill Kakuzu. Byakugo regenerates.
Kakuzu's was near death plus RS ****s up your chakra network meaning that both did and Byakugo is in-effective.Base incomplete non-throwable FRS couldnt kill Kakuzu. Byakugo regenerates.
Yeah Tsunade has been near death so many times and Byakugo just regenerates. Byakugo regenerates on a cellular level which is the same level FRS damages on.Kakuzu's was near death plus RS ****s up your chakra network meaning that both did and Byakugo is in-effective.