Why did naruto not use Gamabunta against sasuke?
Did he not want to really bring sasuke back?
Or by your logic, can we assume that means that sasuke can easily defeat gamabunta?
We can sit here all day and question why the writer did not do certain things, But at the end of the day you'll come to no solid conclusion with logic like that
No we can come to the conclusion that Naruto could not summon Gama at that time, it is possible that Gama wa sbeing used by someone else.
Gama is not a good example.
Look all this thread was about was the fact that we saw this new skill Susanoo arrow, being used in place of Amaterasu, and I think that means something, yes you are right there are things that we can put down to plot, but this reaches much to far out.
It's like saying why did Kabuto not summon Madara to aid him, it was obviously because he thought he did not need Madara and that he could deal with Itachi and Sasuke on his own.
I could say the exact same thing about what a lot of people have been saying, "You need the Raikages speed in order to dodge Amaterasu, since he is the only one that has dodged it", I can say that is plot no right??
There are times when plot no needs to be used.
Gamabunta at that stage in the Manga was feared to an extent by the people he summoned and in fact got angry when he was summoned for useless reasons.
He get's summoned for things like save the village, not saving a kid.
Sasuke wanted to kill Kakashi, he had enough chakra to use amaterasu, but he did not.
He did not use chidori current, because it does not reach that far, he did not use Sharingan Genjuts because it would not work, he did not throw a kunai because it would not work, he used a susanoo arrow, he did not use Amaterasu.
This ^^^^^^^^^^^^ is not plot no jutsu , I am allowed to use logic from time to time when talking about the NU.
You have no ground on such a stupid statement.
1.The only way to dodge amaturasu is only to be as fast as raikages full
2.DO NOT FORGET that sasuke was trying to show kakashi the power of a true uchiha....
1.You have no ground on such a stupid statement.
2.You have no ground on such a stupid statement.